Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767274›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Coupling Up: A Dynamic Investigation of Romantic Partners' Neurobiological States During Nonverbal Connection.

Cailee M Nelson, Christian O'Reilly, Mengya Xia, Caitlin M Hudac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cailee M NelsonDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7636-1935
Christian O'ReillyCarolina Autism and Neurodevelopment Research Center, University of South Carolina, 1800 Gervais Street, Columbia, SC 29201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3149-4934
Mengya XiaT. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Wilson Hall, Floor 3, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-353X
Caitlin M HudacDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0478-440X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonverbal connection is an important aspect of everyday communication. For romantic partners, nonverbal connection is essential for establishing and maintaining feelings of closeness. EEG hyperscanning offers a unique opportunity to examine the link between nonverbal connection and neural synchrony among romantic partners. This current study used an EEG hyperscanning paradigm to collect frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) signatures from 30 participants (15 romantic dyads) engaged in five different types of nonverbal connection that varied based on physical touch and visual contact. The results suggest that there was a lack of FAA while romantic partners were embracing and positive FAA (i.e., indicating approach) while they were holding hands, looking at each other, or doing both. Additionally, partners' FAA synchrony was greatest at a four second lag while they were holding hands and looking at each other. Finally, there was a significant association between partners' weekly negative feelings and FAA such that as they felt more negative their FAA became more positive. Taken together, this study further supports the idea that fleeting moments of interpersonal touch and gaze are important for the biological mechanisms that may underlie affiliative pair bonding in romantic relationships.

Indexed as

electroencephalography (EEG)frontal alpha asymmetryhyperscanning neurosciencenonverbal connectionromantic love

Identifiers

PMID39767274
PMCPMC11673026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.