ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Challenge of Deep Learning for the Prevention and Automatic Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domain generalisation challenges in breast cancer molecular classification using foundation models: a cross-cohort exploratory study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- A hybrid deep learning framework for accurate breast cancer classification using MRI images.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- An attention-based transfer learning framework for breast cancer classification in mammography under limited data conditions.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- From nucleotides to numbers: a comprehensive review of RNA feature extraction methods for computational modelling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- CT radiomic stratification signature to optimize clinical decisions for ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the underlying biological basis: a multicenter retrospective study.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for tuberculosis control: a scoping review of applications in public health.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis review aims to evaluate several convolutional neural network (CNN) models applied to breast cancer detection, to identify and categorize CNN variants in recent studies, and to analyze their specific strengths, limitations, and challenges.
methodsUsing PRISMA methodology, this review examines studies that focus on deep learning techniques, specifically CNN, for breast cancer detection. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies from the past five years, with duplicates and those unrelated to breast cancer excluded. A total of 62 articles from the IEEE, SCOPUS, and PubMed databases were analyzed, exploring CNN architectures and their applicability in detecting this pathology.
resultsThe review found that CNN models with advanced architecture and greater depth exhibit high accuracy and sensitivity in image processing and feature extraction for breast cancer detection. CNN variants that integrate transfer learning proved particularly effective, allowing the use of pre-trained models with less training data required. However, challenges include the need for large, labeled datasets and significant computational resources.
conclusionsCNNs represent a promising tool in breast cancer detection, although future research should aim to create models that are more resource-efficient and maintain accuracy while reducing data requirements, thus improving clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.