ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in the Management of Complex Pelvic Abscesses.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are utilized in a wide range of therapeutic gastrointestinal applications. We present our experience with LAMS-assisted drainage of complex pelvic abscesses at a large safety-net hospital.
methodsEUS-guided LAMS placements for pelvic abscesses from July 2020 to June 2024 were analyzed. Data were collected on patient demographics, procedure indications, fluid collection size, stent characteristics, stent dwell time, and complications. All cases underwent multidisciplinary review with Surgery and Interventional Radiology (IR) prior to LAMS-assisted drainage; all were deemed not amenable to drainage by IR.
resultsEleven patients underwent EUS-guided drainage of complex pelvic abscesses with cautery-enhanced LAMS. Diverticulitis was the most common cause of abscesses (n = 6; 55%). The average time from presentation to drainage was 7 days (1-18). The average abscess size was 7.2 cm (3.9-12.0 cm). The most common LAMS size was 15 mm × 10 mm; each was placed through the left colon and rectum with both technical and clinical success. All abscesses completely resolved with a mean stent dwell time of 28 days (17-42 days). After stent removal, the fistula was not routinely closed. No complications such as stent migration, bleeding, or perforation occurred. There were no recurrences and no patients required additional surgical or IR procedures with a mean follow-up of 25 weeks (SD 35.6).
conclusionsAdequate drainage is the cornerstone of pelvic abscess management, but IR or surgical access can be challenging, with inadequate drainage and prolonged hospitalization leading to significant morbidity. In our experience, EUS-guided, LAMS-assisted drainage provides a safe and effective alternative for managing pelvic abscesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.