ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
DeSPPNet: A Multiscale Deep Learning Model for Cardiac Segmentation.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CardioSynergyNet: A Closed-Loop Multi-Task Deep Learning Architecture for Cardiac Segmentation and Biomarkers with Diagnosis from Paired ED-ES Cine-MRI.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a crucial role in monitoring disease progression and evaluating the effectiveness of treatment interventions. Cardiac MRI allows medical practitioners to assess cardiac function accurately by providing comprehensive and quantitative information about the structure and function, hence making it an indispensable tool for monitoring the disease and treatment response. Deep learning-based segmentation enables the precise delineation of cardiac structures including the myocardium, right ventricle, and left ventricle. The accurate segmentation of these structures helps in the diagnosis of heart failure, cardiac functional response to therapies, and understanding the state of the heart functions after treatment.
objectivesThe objective of this study is to develop a multiscale deep learning model to segment cardiac organs based on MRI imaging data. Good segmentation performance is difficult to achieve due to the complex nature of the cardiac structure, which includes a variety of chambers, arteries, and tissues. Furthermore, the human heart is also constantly beating, leading to motion artifacts that reduce image clarity and consistency. As a result, a multiscale method is explored to overcome various challenges in segmenting cardiac MRI images.
methodsThis paper proposes DeSPPNet, a multiscale-based deep learning network. Its foundation follows encoder-decoder pair architecture that utilizes the Spatial Pyramid Pooling (SPP) layer to improve the performance of cardiac semantic segmentation. The SPP layer is designed to pool features from densely convolutional layers at different scales or sizes, which will be combined to maintain a set of spatial information. By processing features at different spatial resolutions, the multiscale densely connected layer in the form of the Pyramid Pooling Dense Module (PPDM) helps the network to capture both local and global context, preserving finer details of the cardiac structure while also capturing the broader context required to accurately segment larger cardiac structures. The PPDM is incorporated into the deeper layer of the encoder section of the deep learning network to allow it to recognize complex semantic features.
resultsAn analysis of multiple PPDM placement scenarios and structural variations revealed that the 3-path PPDM, positioned at the encoder layer 5, yielded optimal segmentation performance, achieving dice, intersection over union (IoU), and accuracy scores of 0.859, 0.800, and 0.993, respectively.
conclusionsDifferent PPDM configurations produce a different effect on the network; as such, a shallower layer placement, like encoder layer 4, retains more spatial data that need more parallel paths to gather the optimal set of multiscale features. In contrast, deeper layers contain more informative features but at a lower spatial resolution, which reduces the number of parallel paths required to provide optimal multiscale context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.