Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767124›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Quantitatively Detecting Camellia Oil Products Adulterated by Rice Bran Oil and Corn Oil Using Raman Spectroscopy: A Comparative Study Between Models Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms and Chemometric Algorithms.

Henan Liu, Sijia Ma, Ni Liang, Xin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henan LiuSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China.
Sijia MaSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China.
Ni LiangSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China.
Xin WangSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fast and accurate quantitative detection of camellia oil products is significant for multiple reasons. In this study, rice bran oil and corn oil, whose Raman spectra both hold great similarities with camellia oil, are blended with camellia oil, and the concentration of each composition is predicted by models with varying feature extraction methods and regression algorithms. Back propagation neural network (BPNN), which has been rarely investigated in previous work, is used to construct regression models, the performances of which are compared with models using random forest (RF) and partial least squares regression (PLSR). Independent component analysis (ICA), competitive adaptive reweighing sampling (CARS), and their dual combinations served to extract spectral features. In camellia oil adulteration with rice bran oil, both the ICA-BPNN and ICA-PLSR models are found to achieve satisfactory performances. For camellia oil adulteration with rice bran oil and corn oil, on the other hand, the performances of BPNN-based models are substantially deteriorated, and the best prediction accuracy is achieved by a PLSR model coupled with CARS-ICA. In addition to performance fluctuations with varying regression algorithms, the output for feature extraction method also played a vital role in ultimate prediction performance.

Indexed as

adulteration quantificationback propagation neural networkcamellia oil productscorn oil productsRaman spectroscopyrice bran oil products

Identifiers

PMID39767124
PMCPMC11675215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.