Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767123›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Scientific Mapping of Chia Protein Research: State of the Art and Future Trends.

Júlia Scherer Santos, Arthur Coelho Durso, César Augusto Sodré da Silva, Rejane de Castro Santana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Júlia Scherer SantosDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7441-1940
Arthur Coelho DursoDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.
César Augusto Sodré da SilvaDepartment of Food Technology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7302-7058
Rejane de Castro SantanaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7794-9252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report is a pioneering bibliometric analysis of chia proteins as well as a review of the current/future themes of chia proteins. Reports were selected from the Scopus database, and networks of co-word occurrence, co-cited references, and the bibliographic coupling of documents were obtained. The health benefits and functional properties of chia proteins/peptides are current themes while the research of chia peptides is an emergent theme. The co-word network showed a low link between health benefits and functional properties, concluding that protein derivatives with both properties must be better explored. This review elucidated how the conditions of protein extraction and protein hydrolysis must be adjusted to maximize the intended functional characteristics and health benefits. An extremely alkaline pH and heating provided chia proteins with the lowest solubility, emulsifying properties, and antioxidant activity. Higher hydrolysis time increases peptides' hydrolysis degree, which affects its biological activity. Moreover, chia peptides showed higher oil absorption and emulsifying properties than chia protein isolates. The highlighted findings of this report represent the current research status which may require a new updated review in the future. A more in-depth approach to chia protein derivatives' extraction will enable their quick development in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries.

Indexed as

bibliometricfunctional foodspeptideSalvia hispanicatechno-functional

Identifiers

PMID39767123
PMCPMC11675636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.