Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767080›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Variety Screening and Characterization Analysis of Storage Stability of Eating Quality of Rice.

Jinyu Tian, Guangmei Ji, Jiafeng Zhang, Danqiu Luo, Fang Zhang, Lijiang Li, Mingjin Jiang, Dawei Zhu, Min Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jinyu TianRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2610-1307
Guangmei JiRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Jiafeng ZhangRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Danqiu LuoRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Fang ZhangRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Lijiang LiRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Mingjin JiangRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Dawei ZhuRice Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China.
Min LiRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.

Funding

The Guizhou Provincial Basic Research Program (Natural Science) [2025]307the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects QKHJC[2024]youth075the High-level Innovative Talent Project of Guizhou Province GCC[2023]065the Science and Technology Fund Project of Guizhou Province ZK2022-285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To screen rice varieties with high storage stability for eating quality and elucidate their traits, 34 widely grown rice varieties were selected to examine the changes in the eating quality of their grains after natural storage for one year. A hierarchical analysis, normalization method, and cluster analysis were used to identify the rice varieties that maintained their eating quality during storage. Meanwhile, the yield and its components, panicle traits, grain size, grain major component content, physiological indicators (such as antioxidant enzyme activity), and key growth stages were analyzed at rice maturity. The results showed that after storage, the values of the appearance, texture, and taste of the cooked rice decreased by 18.7%, 19.1%, and 14.2%, respectively. The storage stability of the eating quality of rice was evaluated using a hierarchical analysis based on the storage stability scores of the appearance, texture, and taste of the cooked rice. A judgment matrix was established, where the corresponding weights of the appearance, texture, and taste of the cooked rice were identified to be 0.105, 0.259, and 0.637, respectively. Based on a cluster analysis and the normalization method, these varieties were classified into three categories regarding the storage stability of their eating quality: high storage stability, intermediate storage stability, and low storage stability, accounting for 14.7%, 52.9%, and 32.4%, respectively. Finally, five rice varieties with high storage stability were screened. These varieties exhibited storage stability scores of the appearance, texture, and taste of cooked rice that were 215%, 219%, and 340% higher than those of the low storage stability type, respectively. The correlation analysis revealed that the storage stability of the eating quality of the rice was significantly and negatively correlated with amylose starch content, peroxidase activity, and malondialdehyde content. The amylose starch content, peroxidase activity, and malondialdehyde content of the high storage stability type were 12.4%, 35.9%, and 6.42% lower than those of the low-storage-stability variety, respectively. Therefore, the major features of rice varieties with high storage stability included low amylose starch content, diminished peroxidase activity, and low malondialdehyde content. This study provides valuable theoretical insights into the safe storage of rice grains and the selection and breeding of rice varieties with high storage stability.

Indexed as

characterization analysiseating qualityricestorage stabilityvariety screening

Identifiers

PMID39767080
PMCPMC11675847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.