Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39766958›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Use of Explainable Machine Learning for the Prediction of the Quality of Bulk-Tank Milk in Sheep and Goat Farms.

Daphne T Lianou, Yiannis Kiouvrekis, Charalambia K Michael, Natalia G C Vasileiou, Ioannis Psomadakis, Antonis P Politis, Angeliki I Katsafadou, Eleni I Katsarou, Maria V Bourganou, Dimitra V Liagka and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daphne T LianouVeterinary Faculty, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.
Yiannis KiouvrekisFaculty of Public and One Health, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6805-3203
Charalambia K MichaelSchool of Veterinary Medicine, European University of Cyprus, Engomi, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Natalia G C VasileiouFaculty of Animal Science, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Ioannis PsomadakisFaculty of Public and One Health, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.ORCID 0009-0001-6844-0649
Antonis P PolitisVeterinary Faculty, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.
Angeliki I KatsafadouFaculty of Public and One Health, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9533-0093
Eleni I KatsarouVeterinary Faculty, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.
Maria V BourganouFaculty of Public and One Health, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.ORCID 0009-0009-7417-7830
Dimitra V LiagkaFaculty of Animal Science, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Dimitrios C ChatzopoulosFaculty of Public and One Health, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-7599
Nikolaos M SolomakosVeterinary Faculty, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7578-4984
George C FthenakisVeterinary Faculty, University of Thessaly, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specific objective of the present study was to develop computational models, by means of which predictions could be performed regarding the quality of the bulk-tank milk in dairy sheep and goat farms. Our hypothesis was that use of specific variables related to the health management applied in the farm can facilitate the development of predictions regarding values related to milk quality, specifically for fat content, protein content, fat and protein content combined, somatic cell counts, and total bacterial counts. Bulk-tank milk from 325 sheep and 119 goat farms was collected and evaluated by established techniques for analysis of fat and protein content, for somatic cell counting, and for total bacterial counting. Subsequently, computational models were constructed for the prediction of five target values: (a) fat content, (b) protein content, (c) fat and protein, (d) somatic cell counts, and (e) total bacterial counts, through the use of 21 independent variables related to factors prevalent in the farm. Five machine learning tools were employed: decision trees (18 different models evaluated), random forests (16 models), XGBoost (240 models), k-nearest neighbours (72 models), and neural networks (576 models) (in total, 9220 evaluations were performed). Tools found with the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the five tools used to test predictions for each target value were selected. In sheep farms, for the prediction of protein content, k-nearest neighbours was selected (MAPE: 3.95%); for the prediction of fat and protein content combined, neural networks was selected (6.00%); and for the prediction of somatic cell counts, random forests and k-nearest neighbours were selected (6.55%); no tool provided useful predictions for fat content and for total bacterial counts. In goat farms, for the prediction of protein content, k-nearest neighbours was selected (MAPE: 6.17%); for the prediction of somatic cell counts, random forests and k-nearest neighbours were selected (4.93% and 5.00%); and for the prediction of total bacterial counts, neural networks was selected (8.33%); no tool provided useful prediction models for fat content and for fat and protein content combined. The results of the study will be of interest to farmers, as well as to professionals; the findings will also be useful to dairy processing factories. That way, it will be possible to obtain a distance-aware, rapid, quantitative estimation of the milk output from sheep and goat farms with sufficient data attributes. It will thus become easier to monitor and improve milk quality at the farm level as part of the dairy production chain. Moreover, the findings can support the setup of relevant and appropriate measures and interventions in dairy sheep and goat farms.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegoathealth managementk-nearest neighbourmastitismilk compositionmilk fatmilk proteinneural networkpredictionrandom forestssheepsomatic cell countstotal bacterial counts

Identifiers

PMID39766958
PMCPMC11726918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.