ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Advances in the Application of Infrared in Food Processing for Improved Food Quality and Microbial Inactivation.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Thermal and Nonthermal Technologies for Listeria monocytogenes Inactivation in Ready-to-Eat Meats.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Article
- Impact of drying technologies on bioactive composition of fruit pomace: a critical review and future perspectives.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- Bioassay of the infectivity of heat-treatedFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026Article
- A Single Key for Many Doors? Unlocking the Bio-chemical Potential of Lactobacillus bulgaricus Metabolic Postbiotic.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Optimization of absorption coefficient of quantum dot structures for infrared spectroscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food processing is a fundamental requirement for extending the shelf life of food products, but it often involves heat treatment, which can compromise organoleptic quality while improving food safety. Infrared (IR) radiation has emerged as a transformative technology in food processing, offering a rapid, energy-efficient method for inactivating microbial cells and spores while preserving the nutritional and sensory attributes of food. Unlike traditional heating methods, IR technology enhances heating homogeneity, shortens processing time, and reduces energy consumption, making it an environmentally friendly alternative. Additionally, IR processing minimizes water usage, prevents undesirable solute migration, and maintains product quality, as evidenced by its effectiveness in applications ranging from drying fruits and vegetables to decontaminating meat and grains. The advantages of IR heating, including its precise and even heat diffusion, ability to retain color and nutrient content, and capacity to improve the microbial safety of food, position it as a promising tool in modern food preservation. Nevertheless, there are gaps in knowledge with respect to optimal application of IR in foods, especially in the maintenance product quality and the impact of factors such as IR power level, temperature, wavelength (λ), food depth, and target microorganisms on the applicability of this novel technology in food systems. Recent research has attempted to address challenges to the application of IR in food processing such as its limited penetration depth and the potential for surface burns due to high energy which has delayed the widespread utilization of this technology in food processing. Thus, this review critically evaluates the application of IR in food safety and quality, focusing on factors that affect its effectiveness and its use to moderate food quality and safety while comparing its advantages/disadvantages over traditional thermal processing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.