ReviewGenes2024
Role of the
Review in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Population Structure, Genetic Diversity, and Selection Signatures in Kazakh Dromedary and Bactrian Camels.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Review
- Nutrigenetic Markers Related to Nutrient Metabolism, Recovery, and Performance in Athletes: a Review of Current Evidence.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
- Genetic Susceptibility to Sport-Related Muscle Injuries: Insights from the Literature and Novel Gene Candidates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Next-Generation Approaches in Sports Medicine: The Role of Genetics, Omics, and Digital Health in Optimizing Athlete Performance and Longevity-A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Associations ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Research Progress on the Therapeutic Mechanisms of Stigmasterol for Multiple Diseases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Distribution of Sport Performance Gene Variations Through COVID-19 Disease Severity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Importance of selected genetic determinants on endurance performance and physical strength: a narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies investigating the rs8192678 polymorphism in athletes, its relationship with physical performance, and its broader metabolic effects were included. Data were synthesized qualitatively, and heterogeneity among findings was assessed. The rs8192678 polymorphism influences sports performance differently.
resultsthe G allele is associated with enhanced mitochondrial efficiency, higher aerobic capacity, and a greater proportion of fatigue-resistant type I muscle fibers, benefiting endurance sports like cycling and triathlon. Conversely, the A allele correlates with reduced mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative capacity, potentially impairing endurance but showing possible utility in strength-based sports. Furthermore, the A allele is linked to increased risks of metabolic conditions, including type 2 diabetes and obesity. Discrepancies in results highlight the influence of genetic, environmental, and training interactions.
conclusionsthe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.