ArticleGenes2024
B Chromosome Transcriptional Inactivation in the Spermatogenesis of the Grasshopper
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative genomic analysis and epigenetic profiling of the Drosophila melanogaster B chromosome.Genetics · 2026Article
- B chromosomes put the 'super' in supernumerary.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- An intraspecific origin of B chromosomes in Tetragonisca fiebrigi (Apidae: Meliponini) inferred from cytogenetic and nuclear genome size data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Dynamics of Dosage Compensation and Sex-biased Gene Expression in Morabine Grasshopper Vandiemenella viatica.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesWe analyzed the relationship between synapsis, recombination, and transcription during the spermatogenesis of the grasshopper
methodsThe progression of synapsis was interpreted according to the dynamics of the cohesin subunit SMC3 axes. DNA double-strand breaks were revealed by RAD51 immunolabeling, while transcriptional activity was determined by the presence of RNA polymerase II phosphorylated at serine 2 (pRNApol II) immunolabeling. The two repressive epigenetic modifications, histone H3 methylated at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) and histone H2AX phosphorylated at serine 139 (γ-H2AX), were employed to reveal transcriptional inactivity.
resultsDuring prophase I, spermatocytes with one B1 chromosome showed overall transcription except in the regions occupied by both the X and the B1 chromosomes. This transcriptional inactivity was accompanied by the accumulation of repressive epigenetic modifications. When two B1 chromosomes were present, they could appear as a fully synapsed monochiasmatic bivalent, showing intense H3K9me3 labeling and absence of pRNApol II, while γ-H2AX labeling was similar to that shown by the autosomes.
conclusionsAccording to our results, B1 transcriptional inactivation was triggered in spermatogonia, long before the beginning of meiosis, and was accompanied by H3K9me3 heterochromatinization that was maintained throughout spermatogenesis. Moreover, when two B1 were present, the transcriptional inactivation did not preclude synapsis and recombination achievement by these chromosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.