ArticleGenes2024
An Update of Phenotypic-Genotypic IMNEPD Cases and a Bioinformatics Analysis of the New
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesBiallelic mutations in the
methodsClinical examination of the patients was carried out, and genetic testing was performed using a genome sequencing strategy. A bioinformatics analysis was carried out for the newly reported mutations using PYMOL that was utilized to view the structure and analyze the mutations. Additionally, the ThermoMPNN webserver was employed to check the effect of point mutations on the overall stability of the protein.
resultsOur findings indicate that motor delay, neuropathy, intellectual disability, distal weakness, hearing impairment, and ataxia are the most common symptoms, while the other clinical features fall into two frequency categories: moderately common ones and the least common ones. The bioinformatics analysis revealed that the Q85 residue is highly conserved, suggesting that mutations at this position could disrupt key signaling pathways or cellular functions. Indeed, the Q85R mutation was shown to significantly impair the stability and functionality of the protein.
conclusionsThe clinical presentation of IMNEPD remains highly variable in terms of both severity and progression. Mutations at the Q85 residue have been identified in nearly 50% of reported cases, highlighting this position as a potential mutational hotspot in the PTRH2 protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.