Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39766752›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Multi-Source Circular Geodesic Voting Model for Image Segmentation.

Shuwang Zhou, Minglei Shu, Chong Di

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuwang ZhouCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Minglei ShuShandong Artificial Intelligence Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-1538
Chong DiShandong Artificial Intelligence Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China.

Funding

Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program (Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project) 2023CXGC010113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image segmentation is a crucial task in artificial intelligence fields such as computer vision and medical imaging. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved notable success by learning representative features from large datasets, they often lack geometric priors and global object information, limiting their accuracy in complex scenarios. Variational methods like active contours provide geometric priors and theoretical interpretability but require manual initialization and are sensitive to hyper-parameters. To overcome these challenges, we propose a novel segmentation approach, named PolarVoting, which combines the minimal path encoding rich geometric features and CNNs which can provide efficient initialization. The introduced model involves two main steps: firstly, we leverage the PolarMask model to extract multiple source points for initialization, and secondly, we construct a voting score map which implicitly contains the segmentation mask via a modified circular geometric voting (CGV) scheme. This map embeds global geometric information for finding accurate segmentation. By integrating neural network representation with geometric priors, the PolarVoting model enhances segmentation accuracy and robustness. Extensive experiments on various datasets demonstrate that the proposed PolarVoting method outperforms both PolarMask and traditional single-source CGV models. It excels in challenging imaging scenarios characterized by intensity inhomogeneity, noise, and complex backgrounds, accurately delineating object boundaries and advancing the state of image segmentation.

Indexed as

geodesic modelgeodesic votingimage segmentationmulti-sourcepolar representation

Identifiers

PMID39766752
PMCPMC11675261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.