Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39766725›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Definition of a Heywood Case in Item Response Theory Based on Fisher Information.

Jay Verkuilen, Peter J Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jay VerkuilenPh.D. Program in Educational Psychology, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3546-3411
Peter J JohnsonPh.D. Program in Educational Psychology, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2042-0865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heywood cases and other improper solutions occur frequently in latent variable models, e.g., factor analysis, item response theory, latent class analysis, multilevel models, or structural equation models, all of which are models with response variables taken from an exponential family. They have important consequences for scoring with the latent variable model and are indicative of issues in a model, such as poor identification or model misspecification. In the context of the 2PL and 3PL models in IRT, they are more frequently known as Guttman items and are identified by having a discrimination parameter that is deemed excessively large. Other IRT models, such as the newer asymmetric item response theory (AsymIRT) or polytomous IRT models often have parameters that are not easy to interpret directly, so scanning parameter estimates are not necessarily indicative of the presence of problematic values. The graphical examination of the IRF can be useful but is necessarily subjective and highly dependent on choices of graphical defaults. We propose using the derivatives of the IRF, item Fisher information functions, and our proposed Item Fraction of Total Information (IFTI) decomposition metric to bypass the parameters, allowing for the more concrete and consistent identification of Heywood cases. We illustrate the approach by using empirical examples by using AsymIRT and nominal response models.

Indexed as

Fisher informationHeywood casesitem response theory

Identifiers

PMID39766725
PMCPMC11675695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.