ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Generative Bayesian Computation for Maximum Expected Utility.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Everything Is Prediction: Modern Machine Learning as Bayesian Inference.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Generative AI for Bayesian Computation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bayesian predictive system for assessing the damage intensity of residential masonry buildings under the impact of continuous ground deformation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative Bayesian Computation (GBC) methods are developed to provide an efficient computational solution for maximum expected utility (MEU). We propose a density-free generative method based on quantiles that naturally calculates expected utility as a marginal of posterior quantiles. Our approach uses a deep quantile neural estimator to directly simulate distributional utilities. Generative methods only assume the ability to simulate from the model and parameters and as such are likelihood-free. A large training dataset is generated from parameters, data and a base distribution. Then, a supervised learning problem is solved as a non-parametric regression of generative utilities on outputs and base distribution. We propose the use of deep quantile neural networks. Our method has a number of computational advantages, primarily being density-free and an efficient estimator of expected utility. A link with the dual theory of expected utility and risk taking is also described. To illustrate our methodology, we solve an optimal portfolio allocation problem with Bayesian learning and power utility (also known as the fractional Kelly criterion). Finally, we conclude with directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.