ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach for Critical Node Identification in Complex Networks.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational and Statistical Physics Approaches for Complex Systems and Social Phenomena.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Correctly identifying influential nodes in a complex network and implementing targeted protection measures can significantly enhance the overall security of the network. Currently, indicators such as degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, H-index, and K-shell are commonly used to measure node influence. Although these indicators can identify critical nodes to some extent, they often consider node attributes from a narrow perspective and have certain limitations. Therefore, evaluating the importance of nodes using most existing indicators remains incomplete. In this paper, we propose the multi-attribute CRITIC-TOPSIS network decision indicator, or MCTNDI, which integrates closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, H-index, and network constraint coefficients to identify critical nodes in a network. This indicator combines information from multiple perspectives, including local neighborhood importance, network topological location, path centrality, and node mutual information, thereby solving the issue of the one-sided perspective of single indicators and providing a more comprehensive measure of node importance. Additionally, MCTNDI is validated through the analysis of several real-world networks, including the Contiguous USA network, Dolphins network, USAir97 network, and Tech-routers-rf network. The validation is conducted from four aspects: the results of simulated network attacks, the distribution of node importance, the monotonicity of rankings, and the similarity of indicators, illustrating MCTNDI's effectiveness in real networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.