ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024
State-of-the-Art Trends in Data Compression: COMPROMISE Case Study.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After a boom that coincided with the advent of the internet, digital cameras, digital video and audio storage and playback devices, the research on data compression has rested on its laurels for a quarter of a century. Domain-dependent lossy algorithms of the time, such as JPEG, AVC, MP3 and others, achieved remarkable compression ratios and encoding and decoding speeds with acceptable data quality, which has kept them in common use to this day. However, recent computing paradigms such as cloud computing, edge computing, the Internet of Things (IoT), and digital preservation have gradually posed new challenges, and, as a consequence, development trends in data compression are focusing on concepts that were not previously in the spotlight. In this article, we try to critically evaluate the most prominent of these trends and to explore their parallels, complementarities, and differences. Digital data restoration mimics the human ability to omit memorising information that is satisfactorily retrievable from the context. Feature-based data compression introduces a two-level data representation with higher-level semantic features and with residuals that correct the feature-restored (predicted) data. The integration of the advantages of individual domain-specific data compression methods into a general approach is also challenging. To the best of our knowledge, a method that addresses all these trends does not exist yet. Our methodology, COMPROMISE, has been developed exactly to make as many solutions to these challenges as possible inter-operable. It incorporates features and digital restoration. Furthermore, it is largely domain-independent (general), asymmetric, and universal. The latter refers to the ability to compress data in a common framework in a lossy, lossless, and near-lossless mode. COMPROMISE may also be considered an umbrella that links many existing domain-dependent and independent methods, supports hybrid lossless-lossy techniques, and encourages the development of new data compression algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.