Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39766644›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Modification of Erroneous and Correct Digital Texts.

Mária Csernoch, Carolin Hannusch, Piroska Biró

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mária CsernochFaculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7088-7714
Carolin HannuschFaculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-7293
Piroska BiróFaculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5997-2515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The end-user paradox and the illusion of digital prosperity reveal the contradictory situation in which both non-professional and professional computer scientists and engineers seem satisfied with digital development but unaware of the magnitude of waste generated by end-users and their digital artifacts. To measure this waste and to reveal end-users' problem-solving strategies, our research group set up an objective measuring system that can calculate the entropy of digital texts (EDT). To calculate EDT, a testing process of 53 participants was launched where erroneous and correct natural language digital texts were modified according to the requirements of the tasks. It was found that erroneous documents require more time and information to be modified, which implies that waste is generated by handling these documents. It was also found that when the problem-solving processes are broken down into atomic steps, EDT can reveal uncertainty and idleness, which further increases waste. The goals of the present paper are to call attention to (1) the hidden waste generated by billions of end-users and its consequences, (2) educational approaches and general ignorance which have led to these low-level results, and (3) the need to set up a standard evaluation system for further analyses.

Indexed as

digital textseffectivenessend-usersentropyproblem-solving strategieswaste

Identifiers

PMID39766644
PMCPMC11726735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.