Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39766618›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Classical and Modern Models for Biofilm Studies: A Comprehensive Review.

Zhihe Yang, Sadaf Aiman Khan, Laurence J Walsh, Zyta M Ziora, Chaminda Jayampath Seneviratne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhihe YangSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-9188-6531
Sadaf Aiman KhanOral Health Centre, School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
Laurence J WalshOral Health Centre, School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-5687
Zyta M ZioraInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9664-3101
Chaminda Jayampath SeneviratneOral Health Centre, School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are structured microbial communities that adhere to various abiotic and biotic surfaces, where organisms are encased in an exo-polysaccharide matrix. Organisms within biofilms use various mechanisms that help them resist external challenges, such as antibiotics, rendering them more resistant to drugs. Therefore, researchers have attempted to develop suitable laboratory models to study the physical features of biofilms, their resistance mechanisms against antimicrobial agents, and their gene and protein expression profiles. However, current laboratory models suffer from various limitations. In this comprehensive review, we have summarized the various designs that have been used for laboratory biofilm models, presenting their strengths and limitations. Additionally, we have provided insight into improving these models to more closely simulate real-life scenarios, using newly developed techniques in additive manufacturing, synthetic biology, and bioengineering.

Indexed as

biofilmslaboratory modelsmicro-environments

Identifiers

PMID39766618
PMCPMC11726878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.