ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Phenotypic Differentiation Within the
Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Oral Resistome: From Metagenomics to Precision Oral Health.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Epidemiological Study of the Relationship Between Antimicrobial Resistance Genes and Biofilm-Forming Capacity in Pathogens Causing Chronic Wound Infections.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Genotype-Phenotype Links Between Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzymes and Aminoglycoside MICs in Aminoglycoside-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Detection of ARGs from Gram-Negative Bacteria in Positive Blood Cultures Using a Microarray-Based System: Towards a Molecular Antibiotic Susceptibility Assay.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in protein-based detection and inhibition of AMR pathways.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Review
- First report of multidrug-resistant and pathogenic Plesiomonas shigelloides from endangered crested ibis (Nipponia nippon).BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhole genome sequencing of clinical bacterial isolates holds promise in predicting their susceptibility to antibiotic therapy, based on a detailed understanding of the phenotypic manifestation of genotypic variation. The
methodsWe analyzed the resistance gene annotations of 657,603 clinical bacterial isolates to assess the prevalence and diversity of
resultsAn
conclusionsOur study provides the most comprehensive analysis of clinically relevant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.