Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39766531›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Antimicrobial Resistance in African Great Apes.

Coch Tanguy Floyde Tanga, Patrice Makouloutou-Nzassi, Pierre Philippe Mbehang Nguema, Ariane Düx, Silas Lendzele Sevidzem, Jacques François Mavoungou, Fabian H Leendertz, Rodrigue Mintsa-Nguema

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Coch Tanguy Floyde TangaDepartment of Biology and Animal Ecology, Research Institute for Tropical Ecology (IRET/CENAREST), Libreville BP 13354, Gabon.ORCID 0009-0009-2065-2413
Patrice Makouloutou-NzassiDepartment of Biology and Animal Ecology, Research Institute for Tropical Ecology (IRET/CENAREST), Libreville BP 13354, Gabon.ORCID 0000-0003-0192-5972
Pierre Philippe Mbehang NguemaDepartment of Biology and Animal Ecology, Research Institute for Tropical Ecology (IRET/CENAREST), Libreville BP 13354, Gabon.
Ariane DüxHelmholtz Institute for One Health, Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research, Fleischmannstrasse 42, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Silas Lendzele SevidzemLaboratoire d'Ecologie des Maladies Transmissibles (LEMAT), Université Libreville Nord (ULN), Libreville BP 1177, Gabon.ORCID 0000-0001-5254-3347
Jacques François MavoungouDepartment of Biology and Animal Ecology, Research Institute for Tropical Ecology (IRET/CENAREST), Libreville BP 13354, Gabon.
Fabian H LeendertzHelmholtz Institute for One Health, Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research, Fleischmannstrasse 42, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Rodrigue Mintsa-NguemaDepartment of Biology and Animal Ecology, Research Institute for Tropical Ecology (IRET/CENAREST), Libreville BP 13354, Gabon.ORCID 0000-0002-7581-2228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesAntibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a significant global public health threat that demands serious attention. The proliferation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is primarily attributed to the overuse of antibiotics in humans, livestock, and the agro-industry. However, it is worth noting that antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs) can be found in all ecosystems, even in environments where antibiotics have never been utilized. African great apes (AGAs) are our closest living relatives and are known to be susceptible to many of the same pathogens (and other microorganisms) as humans. AGAs could therefore serve as sentinels for human-induced AMR spread into the environment. They can potentially also serve as reservoirs for AMR. AGAs inhabit a range of environments from remote areas with little anthropogenic impact, over habitats that are co-used by AGAs and humans, to captive settings with close human-animal contacts like zoos and sanctuaries. This provides opportunities to study AMR in relation to human interaction. This review examines the literature on AMR in AGAs, identifying knowledge gaps.

resultsOf the 16 articles reviewed, 13 focused on wild AGAs in habitats with different degrees of human presence, 2 compared wild and captive apes, and 1 study tested captive apes alone. Ten studies included humans working with or living close to AGA habitats. Despite different methodologies, all studies detected AMR in AGAs. Resistance to beta-lactams was the most common (36%), followed by resistance to aminoglycosides (22%), tetracyclines (15%), fluoroquinolones (10%), sulphonamides (5%), trimethoprim (5%), macrolide (3%), phenicoles (2%) and fosfomycin (1%).

conclusionsWhile several studies suggest a correlation between increased human contact and higher AMR in AGAs, resistance was also found in relatively pristine habitats. While AGAs clearly encounter bacteria resistant to diverse antibiotics, significant gaps remain in understanding the underlying processes. Comparative studies using standardized methods across different sites would enhance our understanding of the origin and distribution of AMR in AGAs.

Indexed as

African great apes (AGAs)antibioticsantimicrobial resistance (AMR)

Identifiers

PMID39766531
PMCPMC11672706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.