ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Post-Soviet Countries: A Systematic Review.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Related to Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Among Livestock Sector Stakeholders in Seven Former Soviet Countries: A Multi-Country Regional Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tetracyclines in the Modern Era: Global Consumption, Antimicrobial Resistance, Environmental Occurrence, and Degradation Techniques.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Implementation of Antimicrobial Consumption Surveillance and Stewardship in Human Healthcare in Post-Soviet States: A Systematic Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Social Determinants of Health and Antibiotic Consumption.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat. AMR surveillance is crucial for understanding and controlling the spread of AMR. Surveillance systems can inform clinicians, guide health policymakers, and support effective AMR interventions. AMR surveillance data from former Soviet region countries are often limited, resulting in gaps in up-to-date knowledge.
methodsThis systematic review was registered under the PROSPERO protocol CRD42024537799 and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Data from five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CyberLeninka) and official sources were searched according to the inclusion criteria.
resultsIn total, 30 publications describing AMR surveillance and National Action Plans (NAPs) were included. Among the 15 countries, 14 (93.3%) have either developed a NAP or are in the process of implementing one; and 7 (46.7%) countries have a standardized AMR surveillance system. Almost all countries have reference laboratory centers, but nine (60%) countries have established standard testing methods in all sites. Only three (20%) countries have fully implemented quality assessment. There is an increasing tendency to involve and report AMR data to international networks, and countries will strengthen their AMR systems by adhering to international standards. The subgroup analysis revealed that Central and Western Asian countries are less developed in terms of AMR surveillance, which may encourage proactive engagement in AMR governance in these regions.
conclusionsThis review is crucial for understanding the current efforts and improving AMR surveillance in former Soviet countries. The findings are promising and indicate that AMR surveillance is established in all reviewed countries, although at different levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.