ArticleBrain sciences2024
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Spastic Hemiparesis After Stroke (REPMAST): Study Protocol.
Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesInnovative therapies are needed to reduce disability, facilitate activities of daily living, and improve the quality of life in patients with stroke. Non-invasive methods of stimulating the peripheral and central nervous system are increasingly being used to enhance the effects of existing therapies in stroke rehabilitation. One potentially relevant method for achieving greater improvement is repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS). This randomized controlled trial (RCT), the Peripheral MAgnetic stimulation in patients with spastic hemiparesis after Stroke Trial (REPMAST), will investigate whether rPMS improves upper extremity function, spasticity, and activities of daily living in patients with stroke compared with neuromuscular stimulation (NMS).
methodsREPMAST is an interventional, randomized controlled single-blinded study. Patients with subacute stroke are randomized to receive rPMS or NMS five days a week for three weeks in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. The primary outcome is the change in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity between the beginning and end of the stimulation sessions. Secondary outcomes include changes in the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, the Timed Up and Go Test, the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the Tardieu Scale. A total sample size of 138 patients (69 in each group) is required to investigate the superiority of rPMS compared with NMS.
conclusionsThe aim of this RCT is to provide evidence for an effective peripheral stimulation treatment for stroke recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.