ReviewCancers2024
Adult Cerebellopontine Angle Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Features, Management Approaches, and Patient Outcomes.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extra axial medulloblastoma of the cerebellopontine angle: A rare case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to systematically review the existing individual patient data in the literature on adult cerebellopontine angle (CPA) medulloblastoma (MB) and characterize the patient presentation, management strategies used, and oncological outcomes of this rare entity to guide future clinical practice.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from inception to 19 June 2024. Studies regarding adult patients with histologically confirmed MB radiographically confirmed to be located in the CPA were included. Clinical data were synthesized, and predictors of outcomes were evaluated.
resultsTwenty-seven studies with 42 adult CPAMB patients were included. The median age was 32 years (range: 19-56). Headaches (81%), cranial neuropathy (90%), cerebellar dysfunction (79%), and nausea/vomiting (50%) were typical presenting features. The predominant histological subtype was the classic variant. Maximal safe surgical resection was performed, most commonly using a retrosigmoid approach, and 60% of cases received a gross total resection. Most patients received adjuvant treatment (93%), typically chemoradiotherapy. The recurrence rate was 11% after a median of 18 months of follow-up. Relatively high survival rates of 96%, 85%, and 85% were observed at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Patients who received adjuvant therapy had significantly better recurrence and greater overall survival outcomes.
conclusionsThese results support the consideration of MB in young adult patients presenting with CPA tumors with radiographical features suggestive of hypercellularity and the utilization of a management strategy of maximal safe resection plus post-operative craniospinal irradiation along with chemotherapy to optimally treat these rare patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.