Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39766126›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Evidences on the Use of Hypofractionation in Postoperative/Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature and Recent Developments.

Camille Roukoz, Amina Lazrek, Lilia Bardoscia, Giuseppe Rubini, Chieh-Min Liu, Anne-Agathe Serre, Angela Sardaro, Dino Rubini, Sarah Houabes, Cecile Laude and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Camille RoukozRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, 69373 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2750-0326
Amina LazrekRadiation Oncology Unit, International University Hospital Cheikh Zaid, Rabat 10000, Morocco.
Lilia BardosciaRadiation Oncology Unit, S. Luca Hospital, Healthcare Company Tuscany Nord Ovest, 55100 Lucca, Italy.
Giuseppe RubiniInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1972-3308
Chieh-Min LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung City 83062, Taiwan.
Anne-Agathe SerreRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, 69373 Lyon, France.
Angela SardaroInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Dino RubiniInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Sarah HouabesRadiation Oncology Unit, Portes de Provence Hospital Groupe, 26200 Montélimar, France.
Cecile LaudeRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, 69373 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7118-4511
Salvatore CozziRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, 69373 Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical prostatectomy (RP) is one possible curative treatment for localized prostate cancer. Despite that, up to 40% of patients will later relapse. Currently, post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) courses deliver 1.8-2 Gy daily to reach a total dose ranging between 64 and 74 Gy, completed in 7-8 weeks. Several articles reported encouraging data in terms of the effectiveness and the related toxicities using hypofractionation schedules. The objective of the present systematic review was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicity of the use of hypofractionation in adjuvant/salvage prostate cancer treatments.

methodsMedline was searched via PubMed and Scopus from inception to July 2024 to retrieve studies on hypofractionation in adjuvant/salvage prostate cancer treatments. This study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines.

resultsA total of 139 articles were identified from the initial search. Subsequently, the 139 studies were reviewed by title and abstract. Ninety-five studies were excluded due to being either abstracts or articles not available in English. In the second step, the full texts of 44 studies were reviewed. Eleven studies were excluded for being reviews, study protocols, or focused on SBRT treatments. Finally, 33 studies were included in our analysis, with a total number of 4269 patients. Of the 33 selected studies, 20 were retrospective trials and 11 were phase I/II prospective trials, while 2 studies were prospective phase III trials. The follow-up ranged from 18 to 217 months. Failure-free survival, for those with the longer follow-up, ranged between 85% and 91% at 3 years, 47 and 78.6% at 5 years and 51.5% at 10 years. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal acute toxicity was mild to moderate with similar rates across the normofractionated and hypofractionated groups. Acute grade-3 GU toxicity events were unusual, occurring in less than 4% of the cases overall.

conclusionThe present study is the first systematic review of the literature that includes the first two randomized phase III studies published in the literature. Hypofractionated treatment has been shown to be safe, effective, with moderate toxicity and not inferior to conventional RT, with good biochemical control rates.

Indexed as

hypofractionated post-operative radiotherapyhypofractionated radiotherapyprostatic bed radiotherapysalvage radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39766126
PMCPMC11727527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.