ArticleCancers2024
Evaluation of the Learning Curve Threshold in Robot-Assisted Lung Cancer Surgery: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Influence of Surgical Margins on Oncologic Outcomes in Advanced Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current oncology reports · 2026Pooled it
- Immunohistochemical characterization of the human posterior tracheal wall reveals a possible muscularis mucosae: a pilot study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Rapid Ex Vivo Visualization of Laryngeal Tumors Using a Sprayable pH-Activatable Fluorophore.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Article
- Measuring performance trajectories in lung cancer surgery: a longitudinal study using the French national hospital database from 2020 to 2024.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent publications suggest that the threshold for validation of the learning curve is 25 procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate this threshold using another rarely used method, based on a composite quality indicator.
methodsWe included all patients from the French medico-administrative database receiving robot-assisted surgery for lung cancer, with a focus on hospitals performing at least 25 procedures over the period 2019-2022. For postoperative complication analysis, we used the Clavien-Dindo classification. We used the sequential probability ratio test to estimate the number of procedures at which a hospital achieved its learning curve.
resultsIn France, the number of robotic-assisted procedures has risen steadily in the past few years: 195 in 2019 and 1567 in 2022 (overall, 3706 Robot-Assisted surgeries). The total number of patients with Clavien-Dindo classification > II was 833 (24.7%). Among the 28 hospitals performing at least 25 procedures, eight achieved their learning curve with thresholds ranging from 94 to 174 procedures, and the median was 110. Severe complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory failure, heart failure, acute ischemia of the lower limbs, or pulmonary embolism were significantly more frequent in the group of hospitals that did not validate the learning curve threshold.
conclusionsThis study suggests that the threshold of 25 procedures may not be sufficient to validate the robot-assisted surgery learning curve in lung cancer surgery. To significantly reduce postoperative complications, a hospital would need to perform 94 to 174 procedures to guarantee patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.