Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39766106›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Added Value of Biological Effective Dose in Dosiomics-Based Modelling of Late Rectal Bleeding in Prostate Cancer.

Christian A M Jongen, Wilma D Heemsbergen, Luca Incrocci, Ben J M Heijmen, Linda Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian A M JongenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilma D HeemsbergenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2144-0729
Luca IncrocciDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8981-6310
Ben J M HeijmenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda RossiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3705-2504

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society 14259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesExtracting spatial features (texture analysis) from dose distributions (dosiomics) for outcome prediction is a rapidly evolving field in radiotherapy. To account for fraction size differences, the biological effective dose (BED) is often calculated. We evaluated the impact and added value of the BED in the dosiomics prediction modelling of grade ≥ 2 late rectal bleeding (LRB) probability within 5 years after treatment in three parts.

methodsFor N = 656 prostate cancer patients previously treated in a randomized trial with conventional (CF) or hypofractionated (HF) radiotherapy, 42 dosiomic features were extracted from the dose distributions of the delineated rectum in physical doses and from dose distributions converted to the BED. Part 1: To assess whether an HF BED dosiomics model is generalizable to CF and vice versa, multivariate logistic regression BED models were constructed for HF and CF separately and tested on the other fractionation scheme. Part 2: The BED models were fitted to combined HF and CF data together to test whether this resulted in better models. Part 3: Separate physical HF and CF models were constructed and compared to the BED models.

resultsPart 1: Dosiomics related to large-zone and long-run high-dose levels were predictive for both HF and CF. Deviation from the mean gray level was only predictive for HF. The BED HF model calibrations with CF data and vice versa were generally poor. AUCs ranged from 0.55 to 0.65. Part 2: Compared to the separate models, the models fitted to the combined HF and CF data showed better discriminative ability in CF but not in HF. Part 3: The apparent performances of models for the BED and physical dose were similar.

conclusionsUsing the BED in the predictive dosiomic modelling of late rectal bleeding after prostate cancer radiotherapy to account for differences in fraction doses was of limited value.

Indexed as

dosiomicslate rectal bleedingNTCPradiobiological modellingtexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID39766106
PMCPMC11674648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.