ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Development of a Certification and Grading Procedure for German SCI Units.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesSpinal cord injury (SCI) care in Germany was established after the Second World War, following Guttman's philosophy that post-SCI rehabilitation should not be separated from the acute treatment phase. Reimbursement is negotiated with only rudimentary eligibility requirements. Over time, however, more and more centers have emerged that offer "only" rehabilitation. Therefore, in 2014, the German-Speaking Paraplegic Society (DMGP) saw the need to establish a certification and grading process to protect existing centers and enable qualified reimbursement negotiations.
methodsIn a modified delpi process, key data reflecting the human resources and equipment of the units were collected, and, after lengthy consensus negotiations, a grading was proposed which recognizes four levels of performance. Level Ia-24/7 coverage for all SCI-related emergencies (including intensive care unit care and surgery)-to Level IIb (rehab only, no intensive care unit).
resultsIn 2019, the grading was accepted by the extended board of the DMGP, and all but one of the 27 SCI centers applied to be graded and certified according to a self-reported questionnaire (2020).
conclusionsThe development of the certification requirements and grading system was a complicated process, but it was possible to reach a solution which allowed its acceptance by all German SCI centers. Whether it will result in better care for the patients remains to be seen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.