ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Physiological Mechanisms Underlying the Primary Respiratory Mechanism (PRM) and Cranial Rhythmic Impulse (CRI) in Osteopathy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Airway Function Through Craniofacial and Cervical Manipulations and Emergency-Anesthesia Maneuvers: Applications in Airway Function Enhancement, Pneumonia, and Asthma-Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Patient-Practitioner-Environment Synchronization: Four-Step Process for Integrating Interprofessional and Distinctive Competencies in Osteopathic Practice-A Scoping Review with Integrative Hypothesis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCranial Rhythmic Impulse (CRI) or Primary Respiratory Mechanism (PRM), movement felt on the scalp or the rest of the body, respectively, is a fundamental concept used by osteopaths in their practice for their diagnosis and treatment. However, the physiological basis of this phenomenon remains unclear. Sutherland, the founder of cranial osteopathy, proposed in 1939 that PRM was due to the movement of the cranial bones pulled by the meninges, themselves pushed by the fluctuation of cerebrospinal fluid and the motility of the central nervous system. Since then, Sutherland's theory has become dogma, despite scientific progress refuting it, and few osteopaths have attempted to find better explanations.
objectiveThis systematic review of Medline, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library indexed electronic databases explores current knowledge of the physiological mechanisms underlying the Primary Respiratory Movement (PRM) or Cranial Rhythmic Impulse (CRI).
methodsWe entered the following identified keywords: "osteopathy in the cranial field"; "cranial rhythmic impulse"; and "primary respiratory mechanism". We identified 193 studies, evaluated 115, and identified 28 articles that fulfilled our criteria. We classified the studies in terms of methodological rigor, types of studies and tools used. No study had three good-level items, and only five studies had two good-level items corresponding to the type of study and tools used. The protocol of the review has been registered on PROSPERO-CRD42023488497.
resultsOut of the 28 articles, 20 referenced at least one of Sutherland's hypotheses, often quoting the model to critique or challenge it, while 25 of them refer to other hypotheses and/or mechanisms underlying PRM/CRI: 11 concern vasomotion in blood vessels (7) and lymphatic vessels (6), 20 THM waves, 14 heart rate variability, 9 ventilation rate, 2 the extra-cellular matrix and 1 oxidative metabolism.
conclusionsAlthough Sutherland's theory remains prevalent in general beliefs, in scientific literature, THM waves driven by autonomous system activity have gained prominence, emerging as the leading hypothesis. The results from this systematic review confirm the need for a paradigm shift for the CRI/PRM in osteopathy, and for more rigorous evaluation and communication on a model in step with evolving scientific data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.