ReviewBiology2024
Artificial Intelligence in IVF Laboratories: Elevating Outcomes Through Precision and Efficiency.
Review in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Reproductive Bioengineering: Integrating Fertility Diagnostics, Organ-on-Chip Systems, Cryobiology and Epigenetic Safety for Precision Reproductive Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Non-invasive biomarkers in assisted reproduction: a comprehensive review for predicting IVF success.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies: evaluating efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes in female infertility.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Routine IVF Practice.Biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Embryologist versus AI in embryo selection: agreement and impact on pregnancy rates.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025Article
- Enhancing frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes and treatment personalization through machine learning models.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Time-Lapse Imaging in IVF: Bridging the Gap Between Promises and Clinical Realities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Assessing Reproductive Aging: Role of Mitochondria, Oxidative Stress, and Telomere Biology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Perinatal Care Pathways: A Scoping Review of Reviews of Applications, Outcomes, and Equity.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratories signifies a significant advancement in reproductive medicine. AI technologies, such as neural networks, deep learning, and machine learning, promise to enhance quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) through increased accuracy, consistency, and operational efficiency. This comprehensive review examines the effects of AI on IVF laboratories, focusing on its role in automating processes such as embryo and sperm selection, optimizing clinical outcomes, and reducing human error. AI's data analysis and pattern recognition capabilities offer valuable predictive insights, enhancing personalized treatment plans and increasing success rates in fertility treatments. However, integrating AI also brings ethical, regulatory, and societal challenges, including concerns about data security, algorithmic bias, and the human-machine interface in clinical decision-making. Through an in-depth examination of current case studies, advancements, and future directions, this manuscript highlights how AI can revolutionize IVF by standardizing processes, improving patient outcomes, and advancing the precision of reproductive medicine. It underscores the necessity of ongoing research and ethical oversight to ensure fair and transparent applications in this sensitive field, assuring the responsible use of AI in reproductive medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.