Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39765625›Full record

ReviewBiology2024

Circadian Regulation in Diurnal Mammals: Neural Mechanisms and Implications in Translational Research.

Yirun Jiang, Jiaming Shi, Jun Tai, Lily Yan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chronic Night Shift Is More Detrimental Than Chronic Light at Night on Circadian Rhythmicity and Metabolic Health in a Female Diurnal Rodent.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chrononutrition: Potential, Challenges, and Application in Managing Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yirun JiangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing 100020, China.
Jiaming ShiDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Jun TaiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing 100020, China.
Lily YanDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-2542

Funding

Diurnal Experimental Models to Investigate Neural Mechanisms of Sleep Disturbance in Smith-Magenis SyndromeR21NS125449 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI IWASE, SHIGEKI, YAN, LILY · 2021 to 2021
$444k
Developing a Diurnal Rodent Model for Smith-Magenis SyndromeR03NS137487 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI IWASE, SHIGEKI, YAN, LILY · 2024 to 2024
$170k
NIH HHS NS125449NIH HHS NS137487NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS137487NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS125449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diurnal and nocturnal mammals have evolved unique behavioral and physiological adaptations to optimize survival for their day- or night-active lifestyle. The mechanisms underlying the opposite activity patterns are not fully understood but likely involve the interplay between the circadian time-keeping system and various arousal- or sleep-promoting factors, e.g., light or melatonin. Although the circadian systems between the two chronotypes share considerable similarities, the phase relationships between the principal and subordinate oscillators are chronotype-specific. While light promotes arousal and wakefulness in diurnal species like us, it induces sleep in nocturnal ones. Similarly, melatonin, the hormone of darkness, is commonly used as a hypnotic in humans but is secreted in the active phase of nocturnal animals. Thus, the difference between the two chronotypes is more complex than a simple reversal, as the physiological and neurological processes in diurnal mammals during the day are not equivalent to that of nocturnal ones at night. Such chronotype differences could present a significant translational gap when applying research findings obtained from nocturnal rodents to diurnal humans. The potential advantages of diurnal models are being discussed in a few sleep-related conditions including familial natural short sleep (FNSS), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS). Considering the difference in chronotype, a diurnal model will be more adequate for revealing the physiology and physiopathology pertaining to human health and disease, especially in conditions in which circadian rhythm disruption, altered photic response, or melatonin secretion is involved. We hope the recent advances in gene editing in diurnal rodents will promote greater utility of the diurnal models in basic and translational research.

Indexed as

circadian clockfamilial natural short sleeplightmelatoninsleep apneaSmith–Magenis syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39765625
PMCPMC11727363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.