ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Genetic Analysis of Days Open in Moroccan Holstein Using Different Models to Account for Censored Data.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reproductive efficiency is a key element of profitability in dairy herds. However, the genetic evaluation of fertility traits is often challenged by the presence of high censorship rates due to various reasons. An easy approach to address this challenge is to remove the censored data from the dataset. However, removing data might bias the genetic evaluation. Therefore, addressing this issue is crucial, particularly for small populations and populations with limited size. This study uses a Moroccan Holstein dataset to compare two Gaussian linear models and a threshold linear model to handle censored records of days open (DO). Data contained 8646 records of days open across the first three parities of 6337 Holstein cows. The pedigree file comprised 11,555 animals and 14.51% of the dataset was censored. The genetic parameters and breeding values of DO were computed using three different methods: a linear model where all censored records were omitted (LM), a penalty method in which a constant equal to one estrus cycle in cattle was added to the maximum value of DO in each contemporary group to impute the censored records (PLM), and a bivariate threshold model with a penalty (PTM). The heritability estimates were equal to 0.021 ± 0.01 (PLM), 0.029 ± 0.01 (LM), and 0.033 ± 0.01 (PTM). The penalty method and the threshold linear model with a penalty showed better prediction accuracy calculated using the LR method (0.21, and 0.20, respectively). PLM and PTM had a high Spearman correlation (0.99) between the estimated breeding values of the validation dataset, which explains the high percentage of common animals in the top 20% of selected animals. The lack of changes in the ranking of animals between PLM and PTM suggests that both methods can be used to address censored data in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.