ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Impact of Removing the Monitoring Requirements for Holdings with Atypical Scrapie in Great Britain.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Possible alignment of the EU BSE surveillance with the new WOAH provisions.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atypical scrapie (AS) is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) that affects sheep and goats. Low within-flock incidence suggests that AS is not transmissible between animals, and testing of all animals that exit positive flocks for two years following detection (i.e., intensified monitoring) used to be carried out in the EU to provide data to test this. This intensified monitoring stopped in 2021 but continues in Great Britain (GB). The aim of this study was to predict the number of AS cases missed if this monitoring were also stopped in GB, using a combination of statistical and transmission modelling. The number of AS cases estimated to be missed if the intensified monitoring was stopped was low relative to the number of AS cases detected in other active surveillance streams (e.g., fallen stock and abattoir surveys), at approximately 1 case every 3 years (0.34 per year, 95% CI: 0.18-0.54) compared to 10 per year (95% CI: 4-17) in the active surveillance stream. This suggests that stopping the intensive monitoring of AS would have relatively little impact on AS surveillance and on the power of the available AS data to infer whether AS is contagious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.