ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Comparative Analysis of Muscle Fibers in Selected Muscles of Working and Companion Dog Breeds.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood biomarkers and breed genetics of aging in pet dogs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- An Anatomical Study on Canine Cadavers Investigating the Caudolateral Approach Involving the Elevation of the Anconeus Muscle and Splitting of the Triceps Brachii Muscle for the Potential Treatment of T-Y Humeral Fractures.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiling of Longissimus Dorsi and Biceps Femoris Muscles in Kazakh Horses Reveals Cellular Heterogeneity and Myogenic Regulation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The structural and functional characteristics of skeletal muscle fibers play a crucial role in understanding the physical capabilities of dogs, particularly in relation to their breed-specific roles. This study aimed to compare the muscle fiber composition of working and companion dog breeds by analyzing the triceps brachii and biceps femoris muscles, focusing on fiber morphology, myosin heavy chain (MYH) isoform distribution, and nuclei per fiber. A total of 12 dogs, divided equally into working and companion breed groups, were used in this study. Muscle samples were collected post-mortem and prepared for histological analysis using cryosectioning. Immunohistochemical staining was employed to identify the expression of MYH isoforms, including MYH2, MYH4, and MYH7, which correspond to type IIa, IIb, and type I fibers, respectively. The results demonstrated significant differences between the two breed groups. Working dogs exhibited larger muscle fibers, a higher proportion of type IIa (MYH2) and type I (MYH7) fibers, and a greater number of nuclei per fiber, suggesting adaptations for endurance and strength. In contrast, companion dogs showed a higher proportion of type IIb (MYH4) fibers, indicative of their capacity for short bursts of activity rather than sustained exertion. Companion breeds also displayed a higher fiber density but fewer nuclei per fiber, which may contribute to slower muscle regeneration. These findings may provide insights into the muscle adaptations of dogs based on their breed-specific functional demands and highlight the importance of considering these differences in veterinary care and rehabilitation. The study underscores the influence of selective breeding on muscle structure and function in dogs and suggests further research into breed-specific muscle recovery mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.