Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39765346›Full record

ArticleZhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi2024

[Chinese guidelines on response assessment and minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma (2024)].

Multiple Myeloma Expert Committee of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), Myeloma & Plasma Cell Disease Group, Hematology Oncology Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association (CACA)

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Multiple Myeloma Expert Committee of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO)
Myeloma & Plasma Cell Disease Group, Hematology Oncology Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association (CACA)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of standardized criteria to evaluate treatment efficacy is crucial for guiding therapeutic decisions, assessing prognosis, and interpreting outcomes in treating multiple myeloma (MM). The unique characteristics of MM make its response assessment more complex compared with other malignancies. It primarily depends on serum and urine M protein levels, combined with the number of plasma cells in the bone marrow and comprehensive imaging findings. Recently, the emergence of novel therapeutics has led to significant improvements in MM outcomes. Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection determines deeper remission states. The clinical significance of MRD monitoring is now widely recognized. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) MM Expert Committee and the Hematologic Oncology Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (CACA) have gathered relevant experts to develop the guidelines based on these advancements, aiming to provide a comprehensive reference for response assessment in MM.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualChinaHumansPrognosisGuidelineMinimal residual diseaseMultiple myelomaResponse assessment

Identifiers

PMID39765346
PMCPMC11886694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.