ArticleInternational neurourology journal2024
Implantable Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.
Article in International neurourology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Induced diabetic neurogenic bladder animal models: application characteristics and standardization proposals via systematic data mining.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Sacral Neuromodulation Outcomes for Managing Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Overactive and Neurogenic Bladder.Cureus · 2026Article
- Wireless electrostimulation implants enable sphincter neuromuscular improvement toward mixed urinary incontinence.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Off-Label but On-Target: Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Innovation and the Importance of Patient-Centered Treatment.International neurourology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is highly prevalent among patients with neurologic disorders. Some studies have demonstrated that implantable neuromodulation can improve symptoms of NLUTD. We seek to describe our experience with sacral and pudendal neuromodulation in patients with NLUTD.
methodsA retrospective chart review of patients with "neurogenic bladder" ICD-9/10 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/10th Revision) code was performed at a single institution. This included patients from 2008 to 2020 who underwent stage 1 neuromodulation trial. Demographic and clinical information was collected, including neurologic diagnosis, the character of patients' voiding symptoms, the presence or absence of fecal incontinence, the need for intermittent catheterization, and whether patients had sufficient (>50%) improvement in their symptoms to undergo stage 2 implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement.
resultsWe identified 82 patients with neurologic diagnoses who underwent stage 1 neuromodulation. The most common diagnoses were diabetic cystopathy (17.07%), spinal surgery (17.07%), and spinal cord injury (12.20%). The most commonly reported symptoms were urinary urgency, and urge urinary incontinence. Overall, 59 patients (71.95%) advanced to stage 2 IPG placement including 72% of patients with sacral leads and 76% with pudendal leads.
conclusionNeuromodulation is feasible and effective in the treatment of NLUTD. Further investigation into its utilization is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.