ArticleNeurospine2024
Full-Endoscopic Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Myelopathy.
Article in Neurospine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Technical evolution and short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus conventional open anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- [Comparison of effectiveness between endoscopic and microscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Recent progress in surgical treatment of cervical spine myelopathy - A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article aims to introduce a novel full-endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure to treat cervical myelopathy. Adoption of endoscopic anterior cervical procedures has been lagging due to safety concerns and the necessity of placing an interbody cage. We have developed novel instrumentation and a modified percutaneous anterior cervical approach that allows a safe and reproducible full-endoscopic ACDF. Specially designed retractor blades facilitate percutaneous placement of a zero-profile cervical interbody cage. A 64-year-old male patient presents with chronic neck pain and bilateral paresthesia in his upper extremities, mild ataxia, and positive Hoffmann sign. He has a history of deep vein thrombosis 5 years prior. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans show a degenerated disk, severe central canal stenosis with cord compression and a hyperintense cord signal at C5-6, compatible with cervical myelopathy. An electromyography of upper extrimities shows suspicion of myelopathy at C5-6. Full-endoscopic ACDF was performed at C5-6 to decompress the canal and restore disk height with a zero-profile interbody cage. Postoperatively the patient showed improvement of his symptoms with reduced pain and disability scores and was discharged from the hospital within 24 hours of the surgery. Outcome is satisfactory at 2-year postoperative follow-up. Full-endoscopic ACDF enables excellent visualization of the posterior endplates and cervical canal with constant irrigation, facilitating treatment of cervical myelopathy. No retraction is required during discectomy and decompression, decreasing the risk of postoperative dysphagia, hoarseness and bleeding. A zero-profile interbody cage can be percutaneously placed with special retractor blades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.