Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39765187›Full record

ArticleESMO open2025

Efficacy of pembrolizumab in microsatellite-stable, tumor mutational burden-high metastatic colorectal cancer: genomic signatures and clinical outcomes.

K Yamaguchi, K Tsuchihashi, S Ueno, K Uehara, R Taguchi, M Ito, T Isobe, T Imajima, T Kitazono, K Tanoue and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

K YamaguchiDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan; Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
K TsuchihashiDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
S UenoDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
K UeharaDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
R TaguchiDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
M ItoDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
T IsobeDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan; Department of Comprehensive Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
T ImajimaDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
T KitazonoDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
K TanoueDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
H OhmuraDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan; Department of Comprehensive Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
K AkashiDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
E BabaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan; Department of Comprehensive Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. Electronic address: baba.eishi.889@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), shows significant survival benefits in patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its efficacy in microsatellite-stable (MSS) mCRC is limited. Although ICIs are effective in tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) solid tumors, the impact on MSS-TMB-H mCRC, a rare subset within MSS mCRC, remains unclear. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using clinical and genomic data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) repository in Japan. Patients with MSS-TMB-H mCRC who underwent tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling and were treated with pembrolizumab or other later-line therapies were included. Pembrolizumab's efficacy was compared with that of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib. Genomic profiles of MSS-TMB-H, MSI-H-TMB-H, and MSS-TMB-low (TMB-L) CRCs were analyzed across 71 cancer-related genes.

resultsAmong 127 TMB-H mCRC cases treated with pembrolizumab in the C-CAT repository, 77 were MSS and 50 were MSI-H. Pembrolizumab showed significantly shorter time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with MSS-TMB-H mCRC compared with those with MSI-H-TMB-H mCRC [median TTF 2.0 versus 10.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) 4.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.65-8.64, median OS 4.5 versus 33.6 months; HR 9.86, 95% CI 3.93-24.77, both P < 0.0001]. Among MSS-TMB-H mCRC patients, 19 received pembrolizumab, 73 received FTD/TPI (±bevacizumab), and 18 received regorafenib as their first later-line therapy. Pembrolizumab showed significantly shorter TTF and OS compared with FTD/TPI (median TTF 1.6 versus 4.1 months; HR 2.66, 95% CI 1.41-5.02, P = 0.0017, median OS 5.4 versus 13.8 months; HR 2.42, 95% CI, 1.09-5.38, P = 0.025). Genomic analysis of 6737 CRCs revealed that MSS-TMB-H CRCs harbored fewer pathogenic alterations than MSI-H-TMB-H CRCs but had a profile similar to MSS-TMB-L CRCs.

conclusionsPembrolizumab may be less effective than FTD/TPI in later-line treatment of MSS-TMB-H mCRC, potentially due to genomic similarities between MSS-TMB-H and MSS-TMB-L CRC, suggesting the need for alternative therapeutic strategies in this subgroup.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalColorectal NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalDrug CombinationsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorspembrolizumabPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesPyrrolidinesregorafenibThymineTrifluridinetrifluridine tipiracil drug combinationcolorectal cancercomprehensive genomic profilingmicrosatellite instabilitypembrolizumabtumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID39765187
PMCPMC11758824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.