Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39764927›Full record

ArticleVision research2025

Fixational eye movements and edge integration in lightness perception.

Michael E Rudd, Idris Shareef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dependence of brightness induction on the contrast polarity of a disk-annulus stimulus.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael E RuddDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, United States; Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, United States. Electronic address: mrudd@unr.edu.
Idris ShareefDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, United States.

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Virtual and Augmented Reality Interaction CoreP30GM145646 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI MICHAEL A WEBSTER · 2022 to 2026
$6.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM145646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A neural theory of human lightness computation is described and computer-simulated. The theory proposes that lightness is derived from transient ON and OFF cell responses in the early visual pathways that have different characteristic neural gains and that are generated by fixational eye movements (FEMs) as the eyes transit luminance edges in the image. The ON and OFF responses are combined with corollary discharge signals that encode the eye movement direction to create directionally selective ON and OFF responses. Cortical neurons with large-scale receptive fields independently integrate the outputs of all of the directional ON or OFF responses whose associated eye movement directions point towards their receptive field centers, with a spatial weighting determined by the receptive field profile. Lightness is computed by subtracting the spatially integrated OFF activity from spatially integrated ON activity and normalizing the difference signal so that the maximum response in the spatial lightness map at any given time equals a fixed activation level corresponding to the percept of white. Two different mechanisms for ON and OFF cells responses are considered and simulated, and both are shown to produce an overall lightness model that explains a host of quantitative and qualitative lightness phenomena, including the Staircase Gelb and related illusions, failures of lightness constancy in the simultaneous contrast illusion, Chevreul's illusion, lightness filling-in, and perceptual fading of stabilized images. The neural plausibility of the two variants of the theory, as well as its implication for lightness constancy and failures of lightness constancy are discussed.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityEye MovementsFixation, OcularVisual PerceptionComputer SimulationHumansModels, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationVisual PathwaysChevreul’s illusionFading of stabilized imagesFixational eye movementsLightness perceptionON and OFF cellsStaircase Gelb illusion

Identifiers

PMID39764927
PMCPMC11960087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.