ArticleAddiction biology2025
Sex-associated differences in incentive salience and drinking behaviour in a rodent model of alcohol relapse.
Article in Addiction biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward a Translational Model of Sex-Associated Pavlovian Phenotypes.Addiction biology · 2025Article
- Sex-associated differences in incentive salience and drinking behaviour in a rodent model of alcohol relapse.Addiction biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of environmental cues to trigger alcohol-seeking behaviours is thought to facilitate problematic alcohol use. Individuals' tendency to attribute incentive salience to cues may increase the risk of addiction. We sought to study the relationship between incentive salience and alcohol addiction using non-preferring rats to model the heterogeneity of human alcohol consumption, investigating both males and females. Adult rats were subjected to the alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) paradigm, where they were given voluntary access to different alcohol solutions with repeated interruptions by deprivation and reintroduction phases over a protracted period (five Alcohol Deprivation Cycles). Before each Alcohol Deprivation Cycle, rats were tested in the Pavlovian Conditioned Approach (PCA) paradigm, which quantifies the individual salience toward a conditional cue and the reward, thus allowing us to trace the process of attributing incentive salience to reward cues. During the final Alcohol Deprivation Cycle (ADE5), animals were tested for compulsive-like behaviour using quinine taste adulteration. We investigated sex differences in drinking behaviour and PCA performance. We observed thatb females drank significantly more alcohol than males and displayed more sign-tracking (ST) behaviour in the PCA, whereas males showed goal-tracking (GT) behaviour. Furthermore, we found that high drinkers exhibited more ST behaviour. The initial PCA phenotype was correlated with later alcohol consumption. Our findings indicate a complex relationship between incentive salience and alcohol addiction and emphasize the importance of considering both sexes in preclinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.