Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39764567›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Effect of psilocybin versus escitalopram on depression symptom severity in patients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder: observational 6-month follow-up of a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

David Erritzoe, Tommaso Barba, Kyle T Greenway, Roberta Murphy, Jonny Martell, Bruna Giribaldi, Christopher Timmermann, Ashleigh Murphy-Beiner, Michelle Baker Jones, David Nutt and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03429075 (Psilocybin vs Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03429075 phase2completednot on this map

Psilocybin vs Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Comparative Mechanisms

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2019 to 2020Enrolled59ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsPsilocybin + Placebo, Psilocybin + Escitalopram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. From Stress to Synapse: The Neuronal Atrophy Pathway to Mood Dysregulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Four New Species ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David ErritzoeCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Tommaso BarbaCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Kyle T GreenwayCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Roberta MurphyCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Jonny MartellCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Bruna GiribaldiCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Christopher TimmermannCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Ashleigh Murphy-BeinerCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Michelle Baker JonesCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
David NuttCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Brandon WeissCenter for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robin Carhart-HarrisCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psilocybin therapy (PT) produces rapid and persistent antidepressant effects in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the long-term effects of PT have never been compared with gold-standard treatments for MDD such as pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy alone or in combination. Methods: This is a 6-month follow-up study of a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial involving patients with moderate-to-severe MDD. Participants were recruited from a hospital in the UK. Male or female patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV), moderate to severe depression (HAM-D ≥17), no MRI or SSRI contraindications, confirmed diagnosis by a GP or mental healthcare professional, aged 18-80, and competent in English were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either two 25 mg doses of the psychedelic drug psilocybin administered orally combined with psychological support ('psilocybin therapy' or PT) and book-ended by further support or a 6-week course of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram (administered daily at 10 mg for three weeks and 20 mg for the subsequent three weeks) plus matched psychological support ('escitalopram treatment' or ET). The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in the score on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) at week 6, which has been reported previously. Herein, we present results at the 6-month follow-up time point. Measures of social functioning, connectedness, and meaning in life constituted the study's secondary outcomes during follow-up. Safety in the follow-up period was not assessed. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03429075. Findings: Between January 15th, 2019 and March 20th, 2020, 59 patients were enrolled and 30 (11 females [37%] and 19 males [63%]) were assigned to the psilocybin group and 29 (9 females [31%] and 20 males [69%]) to the escitalopram group. 25 participants in the PT group and 21 in the ET group completed the 6-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up, both PT and ET conditions yielded sustained improvements in depressive symptom severity. The mean between-condition difference in QIDS-SR-16 scores at 6-months was 1.51 (95% CI: -1.35, 4.38; p = 0.311). Secondary outcomes demonstrated that PT had greater mean between-condition differences in functioning (WSAS: -7.46; 95% CI: -12.4, -2.47; p < 0.001), psychological connectedness (WCS: 11.02; 95% CI: 1.25, 20.83; p = 0.033), and meaning in life (MLQ: 4.86; 95% CI: 0.67, 9.05; p = 0.021) compared to ET. Interpretation: Six-week intensive treatments with either psilocybin or escitalopram (with psychological support) for MDD were associated with long-term improvements in depressive symptom severity. The greater degree of improvement in the PT arm at follow-up on psychosocial functioning, meaning in life, and psychological connectedness suggests warrant future research. However, these results are descriptive and should be interpreted with caution. Key limitations of the study include its suboptimal power to detect small but meaningful differences between treatments, missing data, the potential use of additional interventions during the follow-up period, and reliance on self-reported treatment assessments. These factors may affect the interpretation of the study findings and should be considered when evaluating the results. Funding: The Alexander Mosley Charitable Trust and by the founding partners of Imperial College London's Centre for Psychedelic Research.

Indexed as

DepressionFollow-upPsilocybinSSRIs

Identifiers

PMID39764567
PMCPMC11701471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.