ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Practice patterns among ophthalmic surgeons in treating concomitant oculoplastic conditions in preoperative period: A questionnaire-based study.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAddressing oculoplastic conditions in the preoperative period ensures both the safety and functional success of any ophthalmic procedure. Some oculoplastic conditions, like nasolacrimal duct obstruction, have been extensively studied, whereas others, like eyelid malposition and thyroid eye disease, have received minimal or no research.
aimTo investigate the current practice patterns among ophthalmologists while treating concomitant oculoplastic conditions before any subspecialty ophthalmic intervention.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was disseminated among ophthalmologists all over India. The survey included questions related to pre-operative evaluation, anaesthetic and surgical techniques preferred, post-operative care, the use of adjunctive therapies, and patient follow-up patterns.
resultsA total of 180 ophthalmologists responded to the survey. Most practitioners (89%) felt that the ROPLAS test was sufficient during pre-operative evaluation before any subspecialty surgery was advised. The most common surgical techniques employed were lacrimal drainage procedures (Dacryocystorhinostomy) (63.3%), eyelid malposition repair (36.9%), and ptosis repair (58.7%). Post-operatively, 47.7 % of respondents emphasized that at least a 4-week gap should be maintained after lacrimal drainage procedures and eyelid surgeries. Sixty-seven percent of ophthalmologists felt that topical anaesthetic procedures should be preferred while performing ocular surgeries in thyroid eye disease patients.
conclusionApproximately 50% of ophthalmologists handle prevalent oculoplastic issues themselves, seeking the expertise of an oculoplastic surgeon under particular conditions. Many ophthalmologists still favor using ROPLAS as a preliminary screening method before proceeding with cataract surgery. Eyelid conditions and thyroid eye disease are not as commonly addressed before subspecialty procedures compared to issues like nasolacrimal duct obstruction and periocular infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.