ArticleGenetics in medicine open2024
Using visual storytelling to share aggregate findings with families participating in clinical genomics research.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Engaging migrants and immigrants in genetics research.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Community Collaboration in Public Health Genetic Literacy: Methods for Co-Designing Educational Resources for Equitable Genomics Research and Practice.Public health genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Sharing aggregate results with research participants is a widely agreed-upon ethical obligation; yet, there is little research on communicating study results to diverse populations enrolled in genomics research. This article describes the cocreation of a visual narrative to explain research findings to families enrolled in a clinical genomics research study. Methods: The design process involved researchers, clinicians, study participants, a physician illustrator, and a health communications expert. Drawing on themes identified in interviews with participating families, the team developed a story and comic about a fictional family participating in genomic research in the hopes of finding an explanation for their child's condition. Results: Design adjustments to improve the clarity and relatability of the story and accompanying images were prompted by feedback from study participants, who showed a high degree of interest in and support for the project. Spanish and English versions of the final comic book were distributed to study participants, and the feedback received was positive. Conclusion: Our project highlights the feasibility of using visual storytelling to convey genomic research findings to socioeconomically diverse participants. A participatory design process enhances the relevance and relatability of results sharing materials and demonstrates respect for those who contribute to clinical genomics research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.