ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Safety evaluation of medroxyprogesterone acetate: a pharmacovigilance analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system data.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety evaluation of bleomycin in ovarian cancer treatment: A pharmacovigilance analysis using Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system data.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Safety profile of progesterone: Insights from an FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)-based pharmacovigilance study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Natural products and nutraceuticals in the management of chronic inflammatory diseases: efficacy, mechanisms, and comparative insights.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), a synthetic progestogen, is extensively used for the treatment of various conditions, including contraception, irregular menstruation, functional uterine bleeding, and endometriosis. However, like all pharmaceutical agents, MPA is associated with adverse drug reactions. This study aimed to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) associated with MPA in by analyzing real-world data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). By providing a comprehensive assessment of the safety profile of MPA, this study seeks to support informed clinical decision-making. Methods: Data covering the period from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024 were collected from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analyses were conducted using several statistical methods, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). Additionally, time-to-onset (TTO) analysis was employed to quantify the signals of the MPA-associated AEs. Results: A comprehensive dataset comprising 21,035,995 AE reports was compiled. Among these, 3,939 women reported using MPA as a contraceptive method. The reports covered 27 system organ classes (SOCs) and 25 high-frequency AE signals. Notably, significant AEs were identified, some of which were not previously detailed in the medication's prescribing information. Unforeseen significant AEs such as unintended pregnancy (n = 623; ROR, 6.65; ROR025, 6.1; χ Conclusion: Our findings align with clinical observations, highlighting the emergence of previously unreported AE signals associated with MPA and their demographic and TTO characteristics. Further pharmaco-epidemiological studies are required to substantiate these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.