Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39764441›Full record

ArticleJournal of paleolithic archaeology2025

The Uluzzian and Châtelperronian: No Technological Affinity in a Shared Chronological Framework.

Giulia Marciani, Leonardo Carmignani, Igor Djakovic, Morgan Roussel, Simona Arrighi, Matteo Rossini, Francesco Boschin, Annamaria Ronchitelli, Stefano Benazzi, Adriana Moroni and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of paleolithic archaeology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Châtelperronian cultural diversity at its western limits: Shell beads and pigments from La Roche-à-Pierrot, Saint-Césaire.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giulia Marciani *Dipartimento Di Beni Culturali, Università Di Bologna, Via Degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8384-8581
Leonardo Carmignani *Dipartimento Di Beni Culturali, Università Di Bologna, Via Degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6066-1818
Igor Djakovic *Dipartimento Di Beni Culturali, Università Di Bologna, Via Degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2375-5177
Morgan RousselHuman Origins Research Unit, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0604-099X
Simona ArrighiDipartimento Di Beni Culturali, Università Di Bologna, Via Degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.
Matteo RossiniDipartimento Di Scienze Fisiche, Della Terra E Dell'Ambiente, U. R. Preistoria E Antropologia, Università Di Siena, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Francesco BoschinDipartimento Di Scienze Fisiche, Della Terra E Dell'Ambiente, U. R. Preistoria E Antropologia, Università Di Siena, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Annamaria RonchitelliDipartimento Di Scienze Fisiche, Della Terra E Dell'Ambiente, U. R. Preistoria E Antropologia, Università Di Siena, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Stefano BenazziDipartimento Di Beni Culturali, Università Di Bologna, Via Degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4305-6920
Adriana MoroniDipartimento Di Scienze Fisiche, Della Terra E Dell'Ambiente, U. R. Preistoria E Antropologia, Università Di Siena, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3623-9446
Marie SoressiHuman Origins Research Unit, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1733-7745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Châtelperronian and Uluzzian techno-complexes are identified in western Europe in the same stratigraphic position, between the late Middle Palaeolithic and other Upper Palaeolithic assemblages. Both industries include retouched artefacts with abrupt retouch and arched backs, and radiometric dating indicates that these two technocomplexes belong to the same window of time. Here, we provide a detailed, qualitative technological comparison of two Châtelperronian and two Uluzzian lithic assemblages based on a collaborative, first-hand examination of these collections. This study results from a one-week workshop designed to bring relevant researchers together to conduct an in-person investigation of these lithic industries. Our analysis highlights significant technological divergences between these industries. In short, the Châtelperronian is a blade industry with a minor bladelet component produced by freehand direct percussion, whereas the Uluzzian is a flake-bladelet industry with massive use of bipolar percussion and a minor component produced by freehand, direct percussion. Our results suggest that there are no, or very little, technological affinities between the Châtelperronian and the Uluzzian - despite occupying the same window of time. As an extension, this suggests that there was little to no relationship/contact between the groups producing these industries during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition. The distinctiveness of the Châtelperronian and Uluzzian highlights that technological behaviours in western Europe during the 45-40 ka can be very diverse and that general labels such as 'transitional industries' are unsatisfactory in describing this diversity. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41982-024-00202-1.

Indexed as

ChâtelperronianLithic technologyMP-UP transitionTransitional industriesUluzzian

Identifiers

PMID39764441
PMCPMC11700062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.