ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025
The comparison of the efficacy of intramuscular tetracosactide and subacromial triamcinolone injection in rotator cuff tendinitis: a randomized trial.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Percutaneous Electrolysis for Musculoskeletal Disorders Management in Rehabilitation Settings: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Rotator cuff tendinitis (RCT) is a tendon inflammation often following subacromial impingement syndrome. One of the non-surgical management modalities for RCT is subacromial injection of corticosteroids. Some studies have claimed a correlation between ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone) deficiency and rotator cuff lesions; hence, intramuscular ACTH analogue injection has been recommended as an option. This research aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment methods. Methods: We conducted a study with 86 patients suffering from RCT. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 43; one group received a subacromial injection of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, while the other group received 1 mg of intramuscular tetracosactide injection. We recorded the Constant-Murley (CM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for each patient before and 4 weeks after injections to measure pain acuity and joint functionality. Later, we compared and analysed the two scores in each group. Results: Based on the statistical analysis, the mean ages of the participants in the triamcinolone and tetracosactide groups were 53.21 ± 11.37 and 54.56 ± 11.98, respectively. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in VAS for pain and CM scores ( Conclusion: Although both treatment methods exhibit promise for pain relief, subacromial injection of triamcinolone appears more efficacious than intramuscular injection of tetracosactide in patients with RCT, based on a 4-week follow-up. Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir, IRCT20240110060673N1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.