ArticleCureus2024
The Complexities of Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Clinical Case and Review of Inflammatory Pathways and Potential Therapeutic Targets.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the prognostic value of admission IL-8 and sST2 as biomarkers of early myocardial injury in severe community-acquired pneumonia.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Supported Diagnosis of Acute Myocarditis Mimicking Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Patient With Sepsis Due to a Massive Perianal Abscess.Journal of medical cases · 2026Article
- Advances in the mechanisms of the NLRP3 inflammasome in sepsis‑induced cardiomyopathy and targeted therapeutic studies (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: mechanisms, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatments.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM) is a life-threatening complication of sepsis characterized by myocardial dysfunction. SICM significantly increases mortality rates in sepsis. Despite its clinical relevance, SICM lacks a unified definition and standardized diagnostic criteria, complicating early identification and treatment. The pathophysiology of SICM is complex and involves a combination of inflammatory mediators, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and dysregulated autonomic responses. Cardiac biomarkers such as B-type natriuretic peptide, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and troponins provide valuable prognostic insights but lack specificity for SICM diagnosis. This article presents the case of a 69-year-old woman who experienced rapid left ventricular dysfunction, initially misattributed to acute coronary syndrome but ultimately diagnosed as SICM. Her condition improved significantly after several days of supportive care, with full recovery of left ventricular function, highlighting the reversible nature of SICM. This article discusses the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms behind SICM, the utility of cardiac biomarkers, and potential therapies addressing specific molecular pathways. Current management of SICM primarily emphasizes supportive care and hemodynamic stabilization. Further research is essential to develop more precise diagnostic tools and effective treatments for this complex and underrecognized condition. Addressing these gaps could significantly reduce treatment delays and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.