ArticleBiogeochemistry2025
Rapid response of moss-associated nitrogen fixation to nutrient additions in tropical montane cloud forests with different successional stages.
Article in Biogeochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is moss-associated nitrogen fixation controlled by the same factors across shoots, species and sites?Environmental and experimental botany · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) fixation in association with mosses could be a key source of new N in tropical montane cloud forests since these forests maintain high humidity levels and stable temperatures, both of which are important to N fixation. Here, nutrient availability could be a prominent control of N fixation processes. However, the mechanisms and extent of these controls, particularly in forests at different successional stages, remains unknown to date. To address this knowledge gap, we investigated the impact of N, phosphorus (P) and molybdenum (Mo) additions on moss-associated N fixation in tropical montane cloud forests of two successional stages, an old-growth forest and an early-successional natural regrowth forest. We hypothesized that if N is available, N fixation rates would be rapidly reduced, while P and Mo would promote nitrogenase activity. Our results show that Mo additions did not affect N fixation rates, whereas N and P additions, in different doses and combinations, immediately reduced N fixation in both forests. Nonetheless, rates recovered within 1 year of nutrient additions. Nitrogen fixation rates associated with ground-covering mosses were similar in both forests. Interestingly, one year after the nutrient additions, N fixation rates across all the treatments were higher in the natural regrowth forests than the mature forests, suggesting more nutrient limitation in these regrowing forests, likely as a result of higher demand for growth. Our study highlights how moss-associated N fixation responds to changes in nutrient availability across distinct successional stages, deepening our understanding of processes that contributes to tropical montane cloud forests. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10533-024-01195-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.