ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Extension of an ICU-based noninvasive model to predict latent shock in the emergency department: an exploratory study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely adopted for the prediction of latent shock occurrence in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, the usefulness of an ICU-based model to predict latent shock risk in an emergency department (ED) setting remains unclear. This study aimed to develop an AI model to predict latent shock risk in patients admitted to EDs. Methods: Multiple regression analysis was used to compare the difference between Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV-ICU and MIMIC-IV-ED datasets. An adult noninvasive model was constructed based on the MIMIC-IV-ICU v3.0 database and was externally validated in populations admitted to an ED. Its efficiency was compared with efficiency of testing with noninvasive systolic blood pressure (nSBP) and shock index. Results: A total of 50,636 patients from the MIMIC-IV-ICU database was used to develop the model, and a total of 2,142 patients from the Philips IntelliSpace Critical Care and Anesthesia (ICCA)-ED and 425,087 patients from the MIMIC-IV-ED were used for external validation. The modeling and validation data revealed similar non-invasive feature distributions. Multiple regression analysis of the MIMIC-IV-ICU and MIMIC-IV-ED datasets showed mostly similar characteristics. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the noninvasive model 10 min before the intervention was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), and the diagnosis accordance rate (DAR) was above 80%. More than 80% of latent shock patients were identified more than 70 min earlier using the noninvasive model; thus, it performed better than evaluating shock index and nSBP. Conclusion: The adult noninvasive model can effectively predict latent shock occurrence in EDs, which is better than using shock index and nSBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.