Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39764169›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Trustworthiness of a machine learning early warning model in medical and surgical inpatients.

Pedro J Caraballo, Anne M Meehan, Karen M Fischer, Parvez Rahman, Gyorgy J Simon, Genevieve B Melton, Hojjat Salehinejad, Bijan J Borah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro J CaraballoDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-7080
Anne M MeehanDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Karen M FischerDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Parvez RahmanKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Gyorgy J SimonDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Genevieve B MeltonCenter for Learning Health System Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5193-1663
Hojjat SalehinejadKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Bijan J BorahKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In the general hospital wards, machine learning (ML)-based early warning systems (EWSs) can identify patients at risk of deterioration to facilitate rescue interventions. We assess subpopulation performance of a ML-based EWS on medical and surgical adult patients admitted to general hospital wards. Materials and Methods: We assessed the scores of an EWS integrated into the electronic health record and calculated every 15 minutes to predict a composite adverse event (AE): all-cause mortality, transfer to intensive care, cardiac arrest, or rapid response team evaluation. The distributions of the First Score 3 hours after admission, the Highest Score at any time during the hospitalization, and the Last Score just before an AE or dismissal without an AE were calculated. The Last Score was used to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and the precision-recall curve (PRC-AUC). Results: From August 23, 2021 to March 31, 2022, 35 937 medical admissions had 2173 (6.05%) AE compared to 25 214 surgical admissions with 4984 (19.77%) AE. Medical and surgical admissions had significant different ( Discussion: Heterogeneity of medical and surgical patients can significantly impact the performance of a ML-based EWS, changing the model validity and clinical discernment. Conclusions: Characterization of the target patient subpopulations has clinical implications and should be considered when developing models to be used in general hospital wards.

Indexed as

clinical decision support systemsearly warning scoreshospital medicinehospital surgerymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39764169
PMCPMC11702360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.